This is one of those artsy posts that's only tangentially sciency. And by that I mean that it involves water in neat ways. But the photography is beautiful and funny at the same time.
What happens when you drop water balloons on a bunch of bald guys? You take pictures.
Tim Tadder is a photographer who did just that. He "found a bunch of awesome bald men and hurled water balloons at their heads, to capture the explosion of water at various intervals. The result [is] a new head of water hair!" A laser and a sound trigger was used to capture the right moments for each subject and create a "head of hair" that best fit with the man's face. The colors of the lasers add wonderful, visual interest in these amusing photos. Here are a few of my favorites:
See more of these pictures and other projects at:
Tim Tadder's Website
Tim Tadder's Page on the Behance Network
Friday, August 31, 2012
Thursday, August 30, 2012
Captain Planet: The Trailer
A fan-made Captain Planet trailer. So well done, I would see this!
Tuesday, August 28, 2012
How to Leave the Planet
Douglas Adams is one of my favorite writers. He is best known for The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy but has other works you should check out too. This just reinforces the nerd-love:
Friday, August 24, 2012
The Mother-in-Law Conflict
Your mother-in-law. And the need she feels to help you raise your kids. Blame menopause. And evolution.
Humans are a cooperative breeding society. We live in extended family-groups in which both "breeders" and "non-breeders" contribute in rearing the offspring. However, humans are one of the select few species (including pilot whales and killer whales) that are known to stop reproducing long before we die. This means that a significant proportion of this cooperation includes non-breeding helpers in the form of post-menopausal women. As with most things in science, there are hypotheses that to try to explain this structure. Two of these are the Mother and Grandmother Hypotheses. Basically, they say that reproducing late in life is costly but that there are indirect benefits to increasing the reproductive success of your offspring. That makes sense when looking for reasons for the evolution of menopause, if you are going to die if you have late-in-life babies then it is probably beneficial to remove the ability to do so. But the reality is that, in humans, the death risk is only 3 percent before menopause, and that's in societies lacking modern medicine. So maybe there is another reason. Enter the inclusive fitness theory. This is often used to describe social insect societies and non-sterile helpers in cooperative breeding invertebrates. However, this theory typically ignores age-specific reproductive overlap between generations of females. Mix a little game-theory modeling in there and you get the Reproductive Conflict Hypothesis. This postulates that the conflict between mothers and their adult offspring selects against late-life reproduction which may, in turn, select against increasing ages of fertility. Perhaps now would time to point out that in this case we are not talking about the shouting-match kind of conflict, but rather the reproductive conflict between generations.
A new study, published this week in Ecology Letters, tests the hypothesis that this conflict between genetically unrelated generations of women (which I will name and heretofore call the mother-in-law conflict or MILC <--that's a good one right?!) could have promoted the evolution of menopause. Are you are causing your mother-in-law to become sterile? Evolutionarily speaking, of course. The authors of this study used a large data set from Finland that cataloged birth, death and marriage records kept by the Lutheran church between 1702 and 1908. They wanted to know if MILC really exists, what the consequences of it are, and which hypothesis best explained the evolution of menopause.
The researchers found that MILC is an important component. They found that the chances of children dying increased when mothers-in-law and daughters-in-law gave birth around the same time. The simultaneous reproduction of these generations was associated with a decline of 66 percent in offspring survival. Additionally, the children of the older women had 50 percent lower survival. Those are pretty large numbers which suggests that it is highly beneficial for the mothers-in-law not to have children. When using the inclusive fitness model, they found that when the in-law generations reproduced at the same time, there was a strong selection against women remaining fertile after age 51. So which hypothesis explains these changes in inclusive fitness? As it turns out, the Reproductive Conflict Hypothesis and the Grandmother Hypothesis contributed about the same while the Mother Hypothesis had no real effect. Essentially, there are more benefits to being a grandmother (and presumably helping raising your grandchildren) than there are in continuing to have children late in life. However, this study does not address the topic of plasticity in maintaining the ability to conceive late in life or the physiological explanations for the evolution of menopause. As always, more study is needed.
Also:
Nature News article "In-law infighting boosted evolution of menopause"
Labels:
anthropology,
behavior,
evolution,
humans,
reproduction,
sociology
Thursday, August 23, 2012
Tuesday, August 21, 2012
Freshman Survival Kit
OK, prepare yourself because I'm going to fly my nerd flag high. It is that time of year when college campuses around the country are being invaded by new and returning students. A labmate's daughter is starting her first year in college and so as a graduation present I put together a Freshman Survival Kit. I used the excuse of her being a science major to validate my nerd-out. Biologists love dichotomous keys and so why not put one together to tell her all about what is included in her kit. See? Nerd flag. Enjoy!
Monday, August 20, 2012
Lil' Giants of Science
"Carry this century's most notable scientific minds in your pocket. These miniature scientist action figures are colorful caricatures, and the perfect gift for any scientific fan. Fun for play and display, the set includes Darwin, Newton, Einstein, and Tesla. Size of each: 3" tall."
You can get your own The Scientists action figures over at Edmund Scientifics.
Or you can head over to Shakespeare's Den and get a set that includes Marie Curie.
Or maybe finger puppets are more your flavor...
You can get your own The Scientists action figures over at Edmund Scientifics.
Or you can head over to Shakespeare's Den and get a set that includes Marie Curie.
Or maybe finger puppets are more your flavor...
Gifts for all occasions...check!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)














